Long Sunday
‘You are reserved for a great Monday!’ Fine, but Sunday will never end.—Kafka

« Public? No, thanks. | Main | The MS (Emis?) Found On Charlotte Street »

Two New York Jewish Exiles Kibbitz about Woody Allen

    Tmrrabbi_1                                       

Alain:

As a Bourgeois New York Leftist Jew "in exile" in Minnesota, Woody Allen’s films express a great deal about me and the life "I could have lived."

I recently revisited Annie Hall. While not as funny as I remembered, there were many themes that were familiar and reminded me of several of his other works. My point of discussion is "The self-image of the Jew." I will be speaking in the grossest generalities, and speaking on behalf of my people in a way that is inexcusable. But I will ask you to excuse me nonetheless. J

What Woody Allen does is represent a certain self-image of the Jew as eternally suffering from their own displacement. It is not the simple "home sickness" of all traditional romanticism. Rather, it is the sense of not ever having had a place to start, to have always already been looking for a home that we have never had. (Maybe Derrida’s notion of an "originary supplement" would fit this description as well?)

Near the beginning of Annie Hall, Allen is telling a friend that a mutual acquaintance is both politically conservative and anti-Semitic, justifying this with the claim that he asks Allen questions like " How is he Jewing?" and "What are you Jewing Later?" "Could Jew pass me the bagel?" Besides the fact that I have had the same bizarre experience in Minnesota numerous times, it speaks to the Jewish belief that they are constantly the object of scorn and ridicule.

Perhaps the academic cliché of "The Jew" (Le Juif) as the signifier par excellence for the excluded, has never been as clearly articulated as it has by Allen. In several of his films he quotes the Groucho Marx line: "I wouldn’t want to belong to any club that would have me as a member." Why does that have a particular meaning for Jews? I would suggest that the centuries of real persecution have created an internal anguish of never being at home in one’s own skin. Either the club is lowering its standards to let me in (in which case it is unworthy and condescending) or I cannot accept that I (or "my people") have "arrived" to such a point that I somehow belong.

This also reminds me of scene from Stardust Memories (not one of his best films) where Allen has this repetitive dream in which he is riding on a train. It is filled with freaks and weirdoes, many of whom look "Semitic." He looks out the window and sees a train on parallel tracks, full of "beautiful" people laughing and having a great time. He starts to flirt with a very attractive, very "goyish" looking woman (which turns out to be Sharon Stone’s first appearance on film). She gestures to him that he should come over and join her train but Allen is trapped. In fact, his train and hers eventually break off, going in opposite directions. He longs to be on the beautiful train but he knows he will forever be stuck with the misfits.

Other than the personal neurosis that is involved in this account, does it not express something fundamental about a certain self-image of the Jew that seems rather dated? Having grown up watching Allen’s films, they certainly resonate with me personally. (While I did not marry Annie Hall (who was from Wisconsin), I did marry a shiksa and moved to the mid-west.) Yet many of the Jews I know that are my age or younger find it completely foreign to their self-understanding? Why? I think it is because most American Jews have finally assimilated to such a degree that they do not feel this sense of alienation. That is not to say that many of them are not religious, or that they are not "proud" of their heritage. Rather, they have taken over and fully incorporated mainstream American values; to make it and participate in the American Dream is to achieve a certain level of economic success, or at least accept that success is defined in this way. Jews have simply given up their cultural distinctness and concern for others and exchanged it for the convenience of consumer culture. (In Hannah and Her Sisters, Allen thinks he is dying and tries to find meaning in his life. He visits various houses of worship and gurus. One day, after visiting a Catholic Church, he comes home with a bag of groceries. As he empties the bag, he takes out his bread, a jar of mayonnaise, and several pieces of Catholic paraphernalia, such as a bible and rosary beads.)

Likud Judaism has largely colonized America post 9/11 and so I wonder if Allen’s schtick has a place anymore? Perhaps because I am still not a member of the club, his brand of Jewish self-effacement still has appeal.

_______________________________________________________

Alphonse:

This resonates for me in so many directions I don't know where to start.

Zelig

was on television here the other night; one is tempted to see it as a film that was made to be just the straight subtext of all the other films, standing alone without all the paraphernalia of narrative.

I grew up on 89th street and Riverside Dr. where of course I escaped even the slightest consciousness that being Jewish was at all unusual. Everyone was Jewish, whether Jewish or not, on the Upper West Side then. I'm not sure I even heard the word Jewish in childhood - what would be the need? Really it wasn't until I moved to England that I became aware that Woody Allen is really Jewish. It will sound weird except to New Yorkers but his extra special Jewishness never occurred to me - I just didn't see it. But as far as his audience outside NY is concerned, he belongs to an us - and in England journalists still write international Jewry in the newspaper to refer to that us - not to Hollywood, not to America, not even to NY, but to Jews. Our property and our spokesperson. Through this realization about Woody Allen, whom everyone in Bath Spa somehow worked into conversations with me, baffling me for a time (Woody Allen, everyone talks about Woody Allen in Somerset? Who knew?) that I became aware that I am really Jewish, in other peoples eyes. And that this makes me exotic. (In the UK that is. In Paris this is not the case; no one knows, for example, which politicians are Jewish here, but in the UK, everyone knows which politicians are Jewish. A review in a British paper of Joshua Bell in recital managed to mention that he is Jewish. I never even would have wondered. Must have been a disappointment to those trying to compile the Great Goyish Violinists cd.)

But at the same time that my own and Woody Allen's Jewishness were always invisible to me, my NewYorkerness wasn't, and perhaps - and perhaps Woody Allen is even to blame for this - stood in its place. That New Yorker Magazine cover which showed the rest of the US as a thin line at the end of NY really captured something, but missed the actual fear instilled in children of the Upper West Side in the 70s of the rest of the country. I remember my father telling me of his time in the army he spent in Biloxi, Mississippi. The whole idea of Biloxi, Mississippi to me was terrifying. As terrifying as Nazi Germany. A foreign, frightening place I would never willingly go and would expect to be unwelcome. It certainly wasn't 'my country.' Nothing was, except NY.

That homelessness thing you speak of: its curious that Woody Allen riffs on it - on Jewishness per se - specifically as a form of over emotional, romanticized place-belonging, of the ersatz semi-voluntary and yet ineluctable citizenship of NewYorkerness; its hard to untangle what in Allen is revealing or satirizing or commenting on Jewishness (homelessness) and what is commenting on passionate NewYorkerness (an excess of rootedness, an obsession with a fairly small urban locale.) In Husbands and Wives, the Allen character is talking to Farrow, his wife, about wanting to spend time in Europe, live in Paris for a while, and she bursts his balloon with a reminder that he can't survive off the island of Manhattan for more than 24 hours. It's a joke, but only a slight exageration of the New Yorkerness I grew up around - which included a suspicion that we - New Yorkers, but I understand now the modifier was Jews - really couldn't survive elsewhere. The character of that horror fantasy was formed by the film Deliverance. Which took place, as far as I was concerned, simply in "America." Somewhere outside New York City.

(Surely that New Yorkerness is a variation on the theme of universal gentile anti-semitism found in Herzl and analyzed by Arendt. The tangle of 'rootless cosmopolitanism' and the fetishizing and romanticism of the cosmopolis - Berlin and Paris before NY - as specifically a replacement for a homeland, a safe haven of a different order than a national homeland, a beloved physical place with beloved cultural traditions, accents, habits, is pretty knotty.)

My Jewish exoticism is very new to me, but I find the New Yorkerness is natural and grows more visible and detailed to me outside NY; I only recently became aware that there has been a sort of displacement. My New Yorkerness - asked about my nationality or my ethnicity here, I always, unthinking, say 'New Yorker' not 'American' and not 'Jewish' - is obviously both a flight from Americanness and an adaptation of Jewishness, the form of Jewishness instilled in me, attached to an island concieved of as a kind of refuge, a little refugee colony, rather than a patria. I lay the credit or blame for that partly at Woody Allen's door.

By Alain | May 17, 2005 in Dialogues, Film | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/361357/2469165

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Two New York Jewish Exiles Kibbitz about Woody Allen:

Comments

What a great discussion. For me, growing up in Alabama, Woody Allen was the symbol of New York and what it meant to be an intellectual. In a way, I could identify with his alienation as I was also alienated from my little life, but I could also through my identification with his wonderful New York intellectual personae have a fantasy of overcoming my alienation. (I adopted what I hoped was a New York accent while in high school although I had never been to NY.) At any rate, I grew up thinking "New Yorker"--not Jewish, not American--and this New Yorker was the most wonderful identity I could imagine.

I should add that it was difficult, for quite a while, to imagine "Jewish" since in my Baptist mind there was little to distinguish Jews from Catholics and as a white girl in Alabama the only real difference ever acknowledged was race.

Posted by: Jodi | May 18, 2005 5:38:01 PM

Footnote: I saw Deconstructing Harry on Christmas Eve in a theatre in Lower Manhattan. The theatre was packed, everyone laughed together; I was with my friend Roni and we walked out she said 'It's like a different movie on Christmas Eve.' Meaning, in a theatre whose audience was Jewish to the last individual.

But I recall in this movie Allen stages a confrontation between the brand Jewishness he himself can be said to produce - Urban Freudian Atheist Liberal Jewishness - and this other thing, this new nationalist thing, which has arisen and is so alien and inimical to it. Allen's Harry character stops in a Muncie-type town in the catskills on his way to receieve his award at some college. He visits his sister, and her husband, played by Eric Bogosian. And they berate him for being a) an anti-semite or rather 'self-hating' because as he creates Jewish stereotypes in his work and b) abandoning 'his people.' And he's so distressed, trying to plead his universalism, in a weak voice - asserting that all people (perhaps loaded with the idea of no people) are 'his people.' But at the same time the film delivers these characters with a kind of fascinated/horrified anxiety, the film also delivers a certain support to the kernal of their claims about Harry, involving parodies of what could be seen as Allen's own tendency to burlesque Jews. When the psychiatrist wife in one of the Allen character's fictions, played by Demi Moore, 'returns to her Jewishness' - she is the fictional character based on the ground level diegetic character played by Kirstie Alley - we see her with black hair smoothed back in a bun and a black turtleneck sweater, shawl and long skirt, in her shrink eames chair - every detail rings archetype - and you almost expect her to put the shamta on her head and start singing 'far from the home I love.' Its hilarious, but also discomforting - the Moore fictional version of the less fictional Alley is enhanced specifically in the direction of Jewish stereotype - designed to create a certain uneasiness, Allen exposing and parodying his own penchant for that comic's easy way out, not entirely comfortably. And there is something not so comfortable about the whole film. A close friend of mine, who is observant without being actually religious, had said, its just very lucky he had an actor as gifted and as capable as Bogosian in the part of the militant Likudite in Muncie - an actor capable of doing something comparable to what John Turturro did with Pino in Do The Right Thing - or Abraham Foxman would have been on his ass for that segment. In the theatre on Christmas Eve, there was no small amount of squirming in chairs during that part of the film.

Jodi: I also always found something very inviting in Allen's catalogue, sort of ladder, of 'íntellectuals,' from the pseudo to the honored and revered. In the early films, the Allen character is always trying to pass for a man of culture and refinement, a much-less-successful-and-charming Oscar Madison trying to pass for a suaver Felix Unger. The schlemiel, with no hope of posing as Joe Dimaggio, posing as Arthur Miller, to get the goil. Lots of tension there between ribbing and deflating intellectuals (psychoanalysts especially) and really very earnestly subscribing to the cult of geniuses. But I thought Crimes and Misdeameanors, which was so dark, was really a repudiation of the latter, very emphatic and final-feeling, a terrible disillusionment. The great doctor is a murderer, the Primo Levi character a suicide, the sincere hardworking intellectual (Allen) a failure, and the hilltop held by a schmoozing, pompous entertainment industry guy who greatly overestimates his own wit and intelligence.

Posted by: Alphonsevanworden | May 19, 2005 8:10:28 AM

Jodi, I had much the same perception of all other Christians as you did. Many of my friends growing up were Catholic, and they had a distinct religious identity from all the other Christian denominations. Also, I lived in Memphis for a couple of years and really enjoyed it. But I definitely got a sense that some people looked at me as some kind of Carpetbagger, or one of those "dam Yankees."

Alphonse, I love your analysis of Deconstructing Harry. But I did not get the same sense of pessimissm that you did from Crimes and Misdemeanors. Everything happens just as you say but you leave out a couple of things. The re-enactment of Book I of Plato's Republic at the Sabbath dinner sets the tone for a different kind of judgment. At the very end of movie, Allen is talking with the murderer hypothetically about a plot for a film, and Allen points out that there is no redemption in the doctor's version of the story. Then it cuts to the rabbi, who is now completely blind, dancing with his daughter at her wedding. I take this to be an Oedipal allusion; even though the rabbi is blind, he truly has the most insight into what is a good and just life. While the doctor only has the illusion that his life is worthwhile, that he can go about his business as if nothing ever really happened. I take the ending to be far more ambiguous and open ended.

Posted by: Alain | May 19, 2005 1:25:43 PM

Thanks Alain; I'd prefer to see something less pessimistic in that film, which I found unusually moving (esp. relationship of Martin Landau and Jerry Orbach), but it struck me as just dark. I always read the blind rabbi as a blind God himself, the blind agent of morality and moral law, seeing nothing on earth, blind to crimes and thus permitting the criminal to prevail. No Judge sees what people do. There is no court of appeal, that sort of thing.

Posted by: Alphonsevanworden | May 19, 2005 4:43:07 PM

Alphonse

I see what your saying. Perhaps I am projecting my own need for redemption. Oy!

Posted by: Alain | May 19, 2005 5:18:16 PM

Woody Allen simply annoyed me for most of my formative, insecure years until I started reading philosophy. Or more precisely, had a friend who caused me to become interested in philosophy, after earning my deep respect for the practical implications (and otherwise) of such a (sincere) pursuit. We used to smoke a bit and invite ourselves to dual screenings of Allen and Bergman films, put on for this philosophy professor's seminar class every Thursday evening. His theory (I never read his book) was (I believe) that Allen essentially got everything he knew from Bergman...except the possibility of redemption, or even something so fundamental as 'hope'. That Bergman left more room, at the end of the day, for hope. But then he was a Kantian. The nicest of (Heidegger-fused) Kantians. And Bergman often (but not always) strikes me as bourgeois (Shame might be an exception).

http://tinyurl.com/ds6dc

Posted by: Matt | May 20, 2005 1:19:41 AM

Matt: yeah one could say that Woody Allen is a +reluctantly+ atheistic and misanthropic imitator of Bergman, who would like to import the redemption but just really doesn't believe it.

But there is transcendance in WA, explicitly, in the form of the Marx Brothers, the cure for Allen's nausea. Which is really so reflexive a notion of absurd redemption it makes your head ache.

The existential freedom is basically cherished if scary, but sometimes one really craves an impossible justice. I love the God marionette in Fanny and Alexander; I always suspected that was Bergan returning Allen's career of compliments.

Posted by: Alphonsevanworden | May 20, 2005 6:10:06 AM

For what it's worth, and now that this discussion has been collected and presented on the Long Sunday frontpage, I just wrote up some thoughts on Bananas, a film in which, as well as being a Jewish New Yorker, Allen also manages to pass himself off as a Latin American revolutionary.

Posted by: Jon | Dec 12, 2005 10:08:17 PM

Post a comment

Please note: comments are published at the discretion of the post's author and will not appear immediately. Do not submit comments more than once.






 

Technorati Tags:
,