Pro-democratic, anti-vote posts on the recent Canadian election:
Archive "Canada Elect"
Leiter Reports "Thoughts from Canadian Readers on the Election Results?"
Long Sunday "Why I'm Not Voting Today"
Out of the Driver's Seat "Why I Hate Elections", "Canadian Election Results"
Posthegemony "Election"
Theoria "January 23, 2006"
If you're the sort of person who likes to vote:
Tilting At Windmills "A Brief and Brutal Voting Guide", "Our Election Endorsement"
And the stakes in the election:
Conservative Party "Stand Up for Canada" [pdf]
Green Party "Platform 2006" [pdf]
Liberal Party "Red Book" [pdf]
New Democratic Party "Getting Results for People " [pdf]
Finally, our new Prime Minister:
Blogging of the President "The Conservative Platform"
Christian Coalition International (Canada) "Rediscovering the Right Agenda"
rense.com "God Bless Canada?"
Please reply with any other links.

as i asked on CP's post, I'd like to hear why the NDP doesn't cut it for you?
Posted by: CR | January 23, 2006 at 10:30 PM
The readers of Brian Leiter, world's leading expert on Derrida, weigh in.
Posted by: Matt | January 24, 2006 at 03:48 PM
First, the abstract response: the NDP might be the "best choice" (on some scale) of the four major parties. "Best" meaning the most "progressive" or "liberal", I suppose. The problem with any selection is that the selection occurs within the system itself. If, as I think, the system itself is inherently un- or anti-democratic, then the best the NDP could possible represent would be the least un- or anti-democratic.
Second, a more concrete response: this is also possibly the more controversial position. I maintain (quite simply: look around you!) that Canada is a racist, sexist, oligarchic, capitalist, anti-democratic (&c) country. The response that it is "the least" of these things by comparison with other countries is a non-starter. The least still is all of these things. Not being a fan of any of these things, I cannot support or endorse anything or anyone that re-inscribes these inequalities. The NDP is but the human face of neo-liberal capitalism.
Thus, I suppose, the difference between Canadian and American politics is that those who find voting convincing can choose a 'human face' should they so desire. The problem is that the human face is attached to the hand wielding the cudgel of inequality: a nice face just lets that cudgel get closer so it can hit you harder.
Posted by: Craig | January 25, 2006 at 11:56 AM
"Surely it is cynicism today, above all else, that is destroying our country."
So sayeth Robert MacNamara, in a rare moment of emotional blackmail.
How unintentionally true, regardless.
Posted by: Matt | January 26, 2006 at 05:28 AM
Counago and Spaves (also known in some circles as You're not the boss of me!)
Posted by: Blip | January 26, 2006 at 10:48 AM
Pandagon, mockingly.
Posted by: Matt | January 26, 2006 at 11:19 AM
I write quite a bit on the election at my blog, The Reaction:
http://www.the-reaction.blogspot.com/
For example:
http://the-reaction.blogspot.com/2006/01/conservatives-win-minority-government.html
http://the-reaction.blogspot.com/2006/01/in-praise-of-canadian-hedonism.html
Posted by: Michael Stickings | January 30, 2006 at 03:20 PM
A lot of specialists claim that business loans help a lot of people to live the way they want, just because they are able to feel free to buy needed stuff. Furthermore, different banks give consolidation loan for different persons.
Posted by: MicheleMcneil19 | June 06, 2010 at 12:09 AM
"Surely it is cynicism today, above all else, that is destroying our country."
So sayeth Robert MacNamara, in a rare moment of emotional blackmail.
How unintentionally true, regardless.
Posted by: buy wow gold | June 11, 2010 at 04:24 AM
So sayeth Robert MacNamara, in a rare moment of emotional blackmail..
Posted by: archlord gold | June 12, 2010 at 12:00 AM