American students and immigrant workers also take to the streets today. Let's call this an open thread on all things protest, borders, employment, class and immigration, world-wide.
From here:
At least 500 students at Huntington Park High School near Los Angeles walked out of classes in the morning. Hundreds of the students, some carrying Mexican flags, walked down the middle of Los Angeles streets, police cruisers behind them [strangely addictive surveillance video here, second one from left].
The students visited two other area high schools, trying to encourage students to join their protest, but the schools were locked down to keep students from leaving, said Los Angeles district spokeswoman Monica Carazo.
In Georgia, activists said tens of thousands of workers did not show up at their jobs Friday after calls for a work stoppage to protest a bill passed by the Georgia House on Thursday.
That bill, which has yet to gain Senate approval, would deny state services to adults living in the U.S. illegally and impose a 5 percent surcharge on wire transfers from illegal immigrants.
Supporters say the Georgia measure is vital to homeland security and frees up limited state services for people legally entitled to them. Opponents say it unfairly targets workers meeting the demands of some of the state's largest industries.
Teodoro Maus, an organizer of the Georgia protest, estimated as many as 80,000 Hispanics did not show up for work. About 200 converged on the steps of the Georgia Capitol, some wrapped in Mexican flags and holding signs reading: "Don't panic, we're Hispanic" and "We have a dream, too."
Jennifer Garcia worried what would the proposal would do to her family. She said her husband is an illegal Mexican immigrant.
"If they send him back to Mexico, who's going to take care of them and me?" Garcia said of herself and her four children. "This is the United States. We need to come together and be a whole."
On Thursday, thousands of people filled the streets of Milwaukee for what was billed as "A Day Without Latinos" to protest efforts in Congress to target undocumented workers.

Open thread, alright!
Posted by: Woo-hoo | March 24, 2006 at 10:24 PM
..new OpenDemocracy is out, w/more than a couple items of potential interest.
Posted by: Matt | March 24, 2006 at 10:36 PM
Sometimes you just have to step outside of your car and check to see if those borders and divides are even real, and not just a manifestaion of representation.
Tansey's "Doubting Thomas":
http://www.zaunschirm.de/doubting_thomas.jpg
Posted by: Keith | March 25, 2006 at 12:21 AM
Nous somme tous des Framcais!
Posted by: Alain | March 25, 2006 at 09:34 AM
OT, but apparently solving the problem of how to restrain CR from Holbocrates, without merely enabling CR, as discussed, or--best of all--ever needing to read Holbocrates: AK will do it for us!
Posted by: Charles | March 25, 2006 at 02:00 PM
Hippies. God damned dirty hippies...and deadlocks too! In the same post/comment!
Everyone RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!
Posted by: Scott Eric Kaufman | March 25, 2006 at 08:39 PM
Scott's not funny.
Posted by: Charles | March 25, 2006 at 11:26 PM
http://pjoris.blogspot.com/2006/03/student-protests.html
Posted by: Matt | March 26, 2006 at 01:18 AM
This is an open thread, Charles. If you want to say I'm not funny, you're sort of obliged to prove it, preferably empirically. I should add that I have some evidence that I am...
Posted by: Scott Eric Kaufman | March 26, 2006 at 12:42 PM
No, really. You're just not. Sorry.
If you want to say I'm not funny, you're sort of obliged to prove it, preferably empirically.
I take it back, this was a little funny.
Posted by: Charles | March 26, 2006 at 05:32 PM
500,000 protest
Posted by: Matt | March 27, 2006 at 01:38 PM
1 Million Protest in Los Angeles, March 25
These issues are not unconnected to resistance movements (against neoliberal hegemony) in France, though this connection may not be explicit or articulated yet, yes? Or is "hegemony" an outmoded concept these days?
Posted by: | March 27, 2006 at 05:31 PM
A great post over at irrational numbers: Down with Guardrails! Up with Precarité!. From the site:
"The event will never arrive until every dream of carrying some political booty back to the land of the 'real' is renounced; until we reach a universal affirmation of something beyond the picket line, beyond unemployment - unemployability, vagrancy, precarity, the reversibility of futility and unconditional joy, the positivity of anguish. Refusal of the wage-labourer as fetishised ideal in favour of the vagrant, the vagabond. Beckett would surely appreciate this sentiment: only when every worker and student finds their inner tramp is the purposive exoskeleton of capitalism shed and its relative deterritorialization accelerated into the production of a 'new earth'."
Posted by: Keith | March 27, 2006 at 07:53 PM
That is quite something.
Posted by: s0metim3s | March 27, 2006 at 08:38 PM
"The constant movement, the circulation of everything is a paradoxical condition for the functioning of the capitalist machine. In the same paradox, interrupting its functioning is a condition for its disruption."
Substitute *acceleration* for *interruption*. Capitalism-schizophrenia functions only in virtue of its axiomatisation, in the freeze-frame of its systemic recuperation. If the CPE releases the brakes a little, of course it is only to shortly re-engage them. For all this, it cannot be mistaken for the enemy.
Ok, I'll bite... I don't know nothin'bout the ontologizing of axiomatization, but I find this notion that "acceleration" in itself (of capitalism-schizophrenia) is revolutionary, and in a good way, sort of hard to swallow, though quite possibly I'm missing something.
(Where's this notion of 'acceleration' from anyway?)
Posted by: Matt | March 27, 2006 at 10:44 PM
A good reader of Derrida can only fear the worst.
Posted by: Matt | March 27, 2006 at 11:41 PM
Woah, Matt...slow down there.
Posted by: Keith | March 28, 2006 at 12:09 AM
I take it you're a platitudinous liberal, then?
(Me, I'm wild. And when I google the safe search comes all the way off.)
Posted by: Matt | March 28, 2006 at 12:24 AM
"The question of boundaries, of possible shifts or displacements along them, and the question of what is being bounded (or unbounded) are preeminent ones. If we are indeed in a liminal period, then the border is not out there somewhere at the edge of the frame but rather it is here, at zero degree, where the x and y coordinates meet. It is a site of encounter, a point of transition."
- Lyn Hejinian, The Language of Inquiry, p.234
Posted by: Keith | March 28, 2006 at 03:59 PM
interesting
Posted by: Matt | March 30, 2006 at 12:57 PM
Well now we can all just simulate our protests
Posted by: Keith | March 30, 2006 at 02:04 PM
"...deterritorialization accelerated into the production of a 'new earth'."
yikes!?
terre ingrate, mais pas totalement. (Beckett)
Posted by: Amie | March 30, 2006 at 02:18 PM
I checked out the book for the Spivak interview it had, but also found this essay from 1989 by Jean-Luc Nancy that seemed especially relevant. It's from An Other Tongue, Ed. Alfred Arteaga (Duke, 1994)
Posted by: Keith | April 12, 2006 at 04:52 PM
The link posted by Bruno Mitchell is incorrect. That is a hoax site. The correct site is http://www.april29.org.
Posted by: | April 17, 2006 at 04:37 AM