"Ever heard of Long Sunday? It's a group blog about... thinking?"
...Friendship - could this be the name of a relation to thought, to thinking? The name of a relation - and one, now, that lays claim, in some, to the whole of a life: to the same gestures, voice tones and silences, to a way of taking up space or not taking it up. This laying claim would be the presence of thought in the thinker: the way thought keeps a life, even as the thinker supposes that it is thought that must be kept safe.
Thinking of them again - not as friends, but as those who are friends of thought - what communicates itself to me is not the content of a thought - not this, or that idea, but the 'that there is' of thinking, and in another such as him, another such as her. Thought: in person. But there only as a mutliplicity of gestures, of tones and silences, as a way of moving or keeping still...

What does it mean to take up or not to take up space to move or to keep still? Perhaps the group blog performs answers to these questions as each in a different mode is present or absent, writing or not writing, reading or not reading.
Posted by: Jodi | June 02, 2006 at 12:55 PM
proving dwm's point?
-- Kierkegaard, [VIII 93 f.; also The Present Age]Posted by: cynic librarian | June 02, 2006 at 01:11 PM
Long Sunday: An autopoietic system?
After all: "Humans do not communicate. Communication communicates." (Luhmann)
What you can do is doubt it, but that doubting is part of the thinking that recursively orientates itself to the notion of a Long Sunday, rather than any thinking subject, so.... Anyway. Nice post.
Posted by: Christoph | June 02, 2006 at 08:12 PM
I'm giddy for being included, and slightly embarrassed, because my "books read" meter is too low to engage. Two of my last three posts are about Justin Timberlake (and how I love him). But, to ponder your offering further: Do you mean that you're my friend? or that Long Sunday is a blog about friendship?
lol.
Keep it ethereal.
Posted by: David Wilson McLeish | June 02, 2006 at 09:19 PM
Christoph,
I'll have to think about it.
(thanks?)
Posted by: Charles | June 02, 2006 at 09:32 PM
I don't know the 30s are like but this question characterized much for me pre- mid 20s: "Wait - so, is that a dis, or not?" Reading DWM's post I felt younger again, but not in a good way.
Posted by: Nate | June 03, 2006 at 01:28 AM
Still can't get over the "multiplicity of gestures, of tones", as Lars writes so beautifully. Maybe I just had too much Pinot Noir Chardy.
Anyway, I meant what I wrote - very nice post indeed.
Posted by: Christoph | June 03, 2006 at 05:26 AM