« The Animal Question in Contemporary Radical Politics and Thought | Main | A. on the argument »
November Surprise
It's November 1st. Republicans are down 12 points across the board nationally. President Bush is struggling to get to 40% approval ratings. Could there be a better time to "condition the environment"?
Kerry's mispronuncisplained joke was Rove's unintentional October surprise. But could there be a November surprise? Be sure to glance at the last graph of the article.
White House Sees Evidence of Plot in Lebanon
WASHINGTON, Nov. 1 — The White House said today that there was "mounting evidence" that Iran and Syria are involved in a plot to overthrow the government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora of Lebanon, but senior officials refused to describe in any detail the intelligence they said they had collected.
In an unusual statement, the White House said it was "increasingly concerned by mounting evidence that the Syrian and Iranian governments, Hezbollah and their Lebanese allies are preparing plans to topple Lebanon's democratically elected government." (continued...)
American officials who were pressed today about the assertion on Lebanon said they had evidence that Syria and Iran were trying to engineer the creation of a new "unity" government that they could control, partly through the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah. One senior American official, who did not want to be identified because he was discussing an intelligence issue, said there were also indications of "planning for a more violent" attack on the government, but he gave no details.
In the White House statement, issued by President Bush's press secretary, Tony Snow, the administration said there were "indications" that Syria was trying to block passage of a statute by the Lebanese Parliament that would cooperate with an international tribunal being put together to try those accused of involvement in the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. In a warning to Syria, the statement said the tribunal would be established "no matter what happens in Lebanon."
Syrian intelligence officials, including close family members of President Bashar al-Assad, have been implicated in the attack. Syria has denied being involved in the attack in February 2005, which ultimately led to protests that forced Syria to withdraw its troops from Lebanon after nearly three decades.
In interviews in recent days, senior American officials have alluded less directly to concerns about Syrian and Iranian interference in Lebanon's affairs. They have suggested that the concerns are one reason that the United States could not engage in negotiations with Syria or Iran, as several leading Republicans, including former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, have urged.
"Talking isn't a strategy," the president's national security adviser, Stephen J. Hadley, said in an interview late last week, before he headed to Iraq. "The issue is how can we condition the environment so that Iran and Syria will make a 180-degree turn," he said.
By Swifty | November 1, 2006 in Announcements, Current Affairs, Middle East, Politics | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/361357/6658182
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference November Surprise:
Comments
Thank you for posting this Swifty. These people will stop at nothing to carry out their war on the "axis of evil" - they clearly are willing to create a situation that will "inevitably" lead to a wider, regional conflict. But other than to set the middle east on fire, what could the strategic objective possibly be? It can't help secure oil, or fight terrorism, right? Unless they believe by "taking it to the enemy," as Bush likes to say, we are keeping "them" away from the Homeland? But could they really believe that nonsense?
Posted by: Alain | Nov 1, 2006 5:27:52 PM
You know, Alain, I'm just reading now by serendipity (I think that's the word) Derrida's _Rogue States_, from two talks in 2002, thus after 9/11, and he is making very interesting points about the 'axis of evil' in particular. And I agree with you: they will stop at nothing. My opinion is that they will not be unwilling to tamper with the vote. They would regard it as a matter of national security. They really believe it: "If the Democrats win, the terrorists win." Ergo the Democrats cannot be allowed to win. Anything they have to do to protect us and our families, they will do: waterboarding. Vote tampering. Vote suppression activities.
Posted by: Swifty | Nov 1, 2006 5:50:33 PM
Yes, they will do anything, but can they do it this time? what with the media polls against them. I have never been optimistic since Bushies arrived, but even with vote fixing, I've given up the superstition card and decided that the Republicans are fucked on this one. Thank God, whom I'll start believing in again the second the returns are certain in the Democrats favour. Not only are the Republicans able to cause more harm elsewhere, it is too unbearable to live in the U.S. with this sort of government personnel. People ought to be able to remember that the Clinton administrations were NOT the living hell this Bush shit is.
Posted by: Patrick J. Mullins | Nov 2, 2006 2:57:01 PM
Post a comment
Please note: comments are published at the discretion of the post's author and will not appear immediately. Do not submit comments more than once.