Richard Rorty, the leading American philosopher and heir to the pragmatist tradition, passed away on Friday, June 8.
He was Professor of Comparative Literature emeritus at Stanford University. In April the American Philosophical Society awarded him the Thomas Jefferson Medal. The prize citation reads: "In recognition of his influential and distinctively American contribution to philosophy and, more widely, to humanistic studies. His work redefined knowledge 'as a matter of conversation and of social practice, rather than as an attempt to mirror nature' and thus redefined philosophy itself as an unending, democratically disciplined, social and cultural activity of inquiry, reflection, and exchange, rather than an activity governed and validated by the concept of objective, extramental truth."
At the awards ceremony, presenter Lionel Gossman celebrated Dr. Rorty as an advocate of "a deeply liberal, democratic, and truly American way of thinking about knowledge." Dr. Rorty's published works include Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979), Consequences of Pragmatism (1982), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (1988), Objectivity, Relativism and Truth: Philosophical Papers I (1991), Essays on Heidegger and Others: Philosophical Papers II (1991), Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth Century America (1998), Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers III (1998), and Philosophy and Social Hope (2000).
via Telos

more...
Posted by: Matt | June 16, 2007 at 03:14 AM
Rorty was a big part of my intellectual development. It's been a long time but I remember Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature being great as well as the stuff on truth in the different volumes of the Philosophical Papers. I always liked him best when he was taking things apart (mainly by argument but sometimes by mockery). His politics sucked, and it was frustrating when he would make assertions or implications of the type that he was great at dismantling elsewhere - like that a theoretical or metatheoretical position automatically has a political force and therefore supports a political position, for instance. He acted like agreeing with him on philosophy meant one should also be a liberal, as if to be a pragmatist on truth or reference meant to be Deweyan on politics.
Posted by: Nate | July 06, 2007 at 12:58 AM