Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe has passed away. It appears that Saturday night he stopped breathing. He was only 67.
If you haven't yet read, among many other things, his extraordinary essay on "The Echo of the Subject" (Typography: Mimesis, Philosophy, Politics), now would be one time to do so.
Via Mark Thwaite. Pierre Joris has more. Update: and Craig has a request.
Updated the third: A web page in memoriam.
Labouring against work. Mulling over the contributions and remarks made during the course of these readings, this is what strikes me as the first paradox, which is also the specific paradox of abstract labour and concrete labours that, in turn, characterises Marx's distinctive account of capitalism, that which brings all others paradoxes to the fore and makes them boil over. It's all about specificity, the difference and the cut. And is there anything more paradoxical than communism, a class politics that gears itself toward the abolition of class society? Operaismo - ie., workerism - against work. And Tronti's essay is nothing if not paradoxical.
Who would have guessed that a discussion of the refusal of work would result in so much toil?
I've been looking around for an online version of Lacoue-Labarthe's essay, "The Echo of the Subject," in Typography: Mimesis, Philosophy, Politics. It would be a useful and provocative starting-place, I think, to assist in weaving certain themes together. But maybe, in the end, it's better not to blog about such things, or at such length as would be necessary. I'll settle for quoting just the very beginning, to give a taste. (Let it be said that I'm not at all sure this is a great idea, however. Maybe it's still a good idea, if it encourages some people to read further, or at the very least: "it's pretty bad but nothing terrible.")
Recent Comments